Non Gamstop UK Betting SitesNon Gamstop Betting Sites 2025Non Gamstop CasinosNon Gamstop CasinosNon Gamstop CasinosNon Gamstop Casinos

Archive:

2004
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004

2003
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

2002
December 2002
November 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002

2001
December 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Bring back Tomorrows world

The perfect example of family viewing once used to be found on Thursday evenings Tomorrow's World followed by Top of the Pops. Then disaster struck. Tomorrow's World was shifted to Wednesday evening, Johnny Dankworth's classic theme tune was replaced, Judith Hann retired and now the whole series has been ditched.

As somebody who loves science, who adores television and who worked on Tomorrow's World for five years, I want to point out the implications behind one of the most idiotic decisions ever made by a BBC1 controller.

Tomorrow's World offered the BBC a unique way to fulfil its public broadcast remit.It was a weekly primetime show, so it reached a broader, more mainstream audience han any other science programme, and for many people i was their only regular dose of science. When the impact of science on society is greater than ever before, it seems bizarre to ditch he only genuinely popular programme that attempts o explain the subject.

Tomorrow's World also created figureheads for science. I grew up in an era when boffins on television were household names, and my heroes were James Burke, Magnus Pyke and Patrick Moore. In the past decade, he BBC has created just two specialist science presenters, the brilliant Kate Humble and Adam Hart-Davis. But now their main vehicle has been killed off.

Instead, we have Best Inventions presented by ex-Blue Peter presenter Katy Hill and ex-Raw Sex drummer Rowland Rivron, who are perfectly respectable presenters but whose passion for science seems to be on a par with the average hippy dippy crystal healer.

There are also some less obvious consequences ofjunking Tomorrow's World. The programme was an ideas generator, pioneering concepts such as mass experiments (Megalab and Live Lab) and producing items that regularly developed into full-length documentaries.

The programme was also a training ground. Making a short film is relatively easy, but making a good one was one of the toughest jobs in television. Making a five-minute film was also a stepping stone towards full-length documentary film making. I and dozens of other people learnt our trade his way.

The main reason given by the BBC for he axing of Tomorrow's World was the fall in viewing figures. If his is he case, then invest money and talent to make the series more stimulating. Use the BBC publicity machine to generate interest and place it sensibly in the schedule rather than make it do battle with the ITV soaps.

But, claims the BBC, the Tomorrow's World brand will live on in special programmes and science will still be primetime Television only labelled differently. The science might remain, but it is obvious that the content will change to include mainly pop science and creature features, which means less physics and engineering. I worship Lord Winston and Rolf Harris, but medicine and sick pets are not where science begins and ends.

I love he BBC and everything that it is supposed to stand for. Horizon continues to make excellent documentaries and new programmes such as BBC2's Rough Science are innovative. However, killing off Tomorrow's World is cowardly and defeatist. It appears that the controller of BBC1, Lorraine Heggessey, does not think that her factual department has the talent to make science sexy
enough for mainstream viewing. The producers probably
disagree.

Oh,and what ever happened to Top of the Pops ? There was a time when it was on the verge of being axed.The ratings had slumped and some argued that music should not be on BBC1 primetime.But then somebody
had the idea of investing in the programme.The team was
revitalised,the scheduling was changed,the publicity push went into overdrive,and Top of the Pops became a ratings success in a Friday night slot hat seems made for it and a Saturday morning spin-off.

The music is loud,the singers have long hair,the lyrics seem a bit rude and I do not recognise any of the tunes.That is irrelevant.The real point is that flagging programmes can be saved.But only if you care about them.The BBC clearly did not care about Tomorrow's World.

Simon Singh

The author is a broadcaster, former Tomorrow's World
producer and author of Fermat'sLast Theorem

15 Jan 2003